Parables, Allegories and Metaphors About Mormonism

I've used that phrase in several posts and I hear it from the LDS in reference to anything that doesn't emulate what they believe is the high moral platitudes of the religion, it's movies, books, magazines, music, etc.. As I read these posts and hear the frustration and downright anger at the church and it's people, doctrine, and practices for what seems like blatant lies and coverups throughout the history and leadership of the church I am compelled to think about the motives of those who would create the lies, perpetuate them and enforce them.

I made up this casserole recipe and it's a metaphor for the varying levels of believers, enforcers, or creators of the lies.

Dog Poop Casserole

1 bag of tater tots (Ore Ida is best because they come from Idaho and we know that Idaho is a good place because it has Mormons, and Mormons are good because they say they are.)

1 lb. scrambled ground beef (made from hormonally induced cows) drain the fat and rub it on your thighs cause that's where it's all going to go anyway.

2 cans of Campbells Mushroom Soup ( the high MSG kind because it hasn't killed me yet so what's the worry?)

1/2 cup of shredded or finely chopped onions. ( I like to sautee them in with the hamburger.)

season to taste with salt, pepper, and other things that you like.

Stir the scrambled hamburger in with the mushroom soup and onions and seasonings and pour the gravy mixture into the bottom of a cake pan.

Sprinkle and spread (and if you're really anal retentive you can lay them in tidy little McMormon rows) the tater tots on top and lightly season again with salt and pepper.

Bake for 1/2 hr. at 350 or till gravy is bubbling and tots are toasty. Cool slightly and serve with green jello with pears in it and cherry koolaide. My kids called it dog poop casserole because the tots looked like little doodles left on the lawn by our dog Honey. Sometime I'll give the recipe for Cat vomit casserole but that's another day.

Sounds pretty good eh? Now what if I told you that there was actually 1/2 cup of fresh dog doodles in the ground beef. Mixed in and seasoned with onions it is hardly noticeable is it? The MSG from the mushroom soup will kill off any bacteria and negate the fecal taste. Besides, it hasn't killed me yet!!

When I hear the LDS mention that even with the inconsistancies in their doctrine or scriptures, or the revisionist portions of the history and counsel from the "Prophets", I am reminded of the dog poop theory. Even if it smells good and looks good and might even taste good, it still has that essence of shit stirred in and contaminates the whole batch.

Now if you frequently made such a casserole and you didn't know it had the 1/2 cup of dog poop but you served it up anyway, and no one even knew it had been contaminated or read the labels, then it would probably continue to taste good. You'd create a tradition that everyone believed was good, therefore, why mess with tradition. You're not lying if you don't know you're lying.

What if someone, maybe a nutritionist or some other nut job told you that there was MSG in the soup, hormones in the hamburger, and that they make tater tots from the cut off spoiled chunks of potatoes at the ORE IDA plant and they bleach them with food bleach to look nice and white, AND that the onions were grown in sewage fertilized fields in California AND that there was 1/2 cup of dog poop in it.

Well of course, discredit the nutritionist!! They are just naysayers and negative nellies and probably don't even say their prayers.

Now what if YOU actually read the labels, studied the Ore Ida processes, and saw them spraying reclaimed water from sewer treatment plants on the onion fields, and actually knew the person that had slipped the 1/2 cup of dog turds in the mix? If you served it up then, boy howdy, you'd be a regular bastard. If you knew all that for sure and still served it up for dinner with a big cheezy smile on your face, well what does that make you....

Now what if you were the guy working at the Ore Ida plant and you had a side job at the Campbells soup factory and your brother owned the onion field and you supplied the raw sewage for fertilizer, and you knew the dog who'd crapped in the vat? What if you didn't narc on anyone. What if you just closed your eyes and reasoned that you're just a MAN, following the leaders and doing your job? What would that make you?

Now what if you OWNED the Ore Ida Plant and the Campbells factory and the mortgage on the onion field, and it was your dog that was always crapping in the vat, and you ordered your workers to keep quiet about the vegetable bleach, the MSG, the hormones in the beef, and you didn't stop or even scold your dog for crapping in the vat, and you made lots of commercials and promotions for DOG POOP CASSEROLE, making sure that your loyal customers believed it was good for them, would make them eternally happy, and even if they smelled the poop or suspected it was there, it was just a part of the test and if they smile and EAT SHIT, they'll be happy forever and ever. ForEVER AND EVER!!! What would that make you?

So when we're mad at our moms or dads for perpetuating what we've discovered is a big lie, remember, they didn't read the label or work at the factory where the lies were made. They didn't put the dog turds in the casserole and they are not the ones we should focus our anger on.

I understand and agree with many who feel great contempt for the leaders and those "in the know" who continue to perpetuate and enforce the things we've discovered are lies. In fact, I find those leaders far more culpable than the dregs that work in the factory or just cook the casserole. When I see a bishop I feel a little resentment and see a player. WHen I see a Stake President I see an instigator. WHen I see a General Authority I see a perpetuator and enforcer. When I hear about the teachings of the prophets, new and old, I see a schiester on the level of P.T.Barnum.. "There's a sucker born every minute". As long as the Mo's keep popping babies out like Pez dispensers they'll have devotees to fill the big circus tent.

Dang, I'm hungry. I wonder if there's anymore casserole left? Maybe I'll write a cookbook and call it "McMormon Stew-pid Recipes for the Logic/reason Challenged".

Once upon a time, a group of men got together to form a club. They called it: "The Number Ten Club".

They were excited about this club. After all, it was far more than a social club. It was a club with a serious purpose: defending against doubt the special knowledge that each one of them possessed. And that special knowledge was special not only because relatively few people knew it, but because it had been passed on to the members by a man uniquely privy to Universal Omniscience.

And what the man had revealed to them - of course after being informed himself by Universal Omniscience - was that the answer to every mathematical problem in the world, was the number ten.

Certain people didn't believe this. Members of the club referred to them as "anti-Tenners". These anti-Tenners claimed to provide "proof" that, say, two plus two equalled four, not ten. They trusted, the Tenners noted with a mixture of scorn and pride, in the arm of the flesh. The anti-Tenners claimed that the strong feelings that each member of the Number Ten Club (NTC) had experienced upon hearing the words of the man who spoke for Universal Omniscience, were understandable in many ways, but could not be taken to mean that if one had two oranges, and then was given two more, that he would then have ten oranges. They said, rather, that regardless of how anyone felt about it, that adding two oranges to two simply resulted in having four oranges.

But the Tenners knew better. In fact, they knew perfectly. They knew, for example, that it all depended on what one meant by the words "orange", "two", "plus", "equals", and "four". And indeed, the precise meanings of such concepts could only be determined on a problem by problem basis. The only thing that could be predicted with any certainty, was that the answer would in fact turn out to be, as always, ten.

In the case of the four oranges, for example, the Tenners reasoned thusly:

"What, in fact, is an orange? That is, at what point does an orange become an orange? A one day old baby is a 'human being', just as much as a 90 year old. So we correctly call both the infant and the old man 'human beings'. It therefore follows that a very young orange - as young, that is, as a seed - may correctly be called an 'orange' just as much as a mature orange may. And once we realize this, then the 'two'oranges in fact were not 'two' oranges at all, but probably more like twenty, supposing an average of nine seeds per orange, plus the two mature oranges themselves. That added to the other 'two' oranges would then result in a total of forty 'oranges'.

"'But', the anti-Tenner says, 'even if we granted you this, forty is definitely not ten. Thus, you have shown that two plus two does not equal ten'. It is amazing how willfully the anti-Tenners misunderstand and forget everything, for in truth we answered this objection long ago. The answer, in fact, is really quite simple, for all we need remember is this: we wish to 'conquer' this problem; and it is well-known that the most effective way 'to conquer' is 'to divide'. What then shall we divide by? Why, it has to be four, since that is the number of mature oranges we have. And what is the number which we must divide? Of coure, forty, since that was the sum total of all oranges, young and old. And once again, we see the anti-Tenners thwarted, since the answer was (though it never should have been in doubt), TEN all along! The Number Ten really is true."

To the problem, "What is 25 divided by 7?", an even more sophisticated answer was provided by the Tenners; and to the problem, "What is 541.229 divided by 71.33, multiplied by the circumference of a cricket green and then divided by p?", a still more sophisticated answer was produced - so sophisticated in fact, that when parts of it were quoted back to the head Tenner, he failed to recognize his own words and announced that anti-Tenners were 'distorting his views'. And interestingly, when it was finally pointed out to the Tenners that their novel answer to this last problem even on its own terms did not equal ten, they merely huddled and then announced a wholly different means of trying to arrive at the answer they already knew was the only true answer in the world.

On and on it went, each problem met by the undaunted group, who were (perhaps predictably given the boundlessness of human imagination) always able to come up with some explanation as to how every mathematical problem equalled ten - though no two explanations were ever alike, or ever followed the same procedures. All started with the answer, and worked backwards from there. And so, naturally, they were always successful.

The Number Ten Club, thrilled with their fantastic success at always being able to arrive back at the one, true answer, saw no reason to abandon their task or their belief. To do so would be seemingly to defy God himself, after all. He himself, they knew, was the very first member of the celestial Number Ten Club. No, it was impossible that they were wrong. Besides, what meaning would life have, if the number ten weren't all they thought it was? Tenners could only look with a kind of pity at all those who didn't have access to the many pleasures they enjoyed as a result of their special knowledge. And why couldn't anti-Tenners leave them alone, anyway? Why did former Tenners seem to feel a keen interest in the club they had abandoned, even talking for months after leaving about the many clues they should have noticed, which suggested that many problems had answers quite different from ten? The Tenners knew that such critical attention was only further evidence, that the answer to every mathematical problem in the world, was ten.

They even began publishing a special magazine: "The Journal of Number Ten Studies". It was even peer-reviewed; but of course, only by members of the Number Ten Club, who were the only ones, after all, who were really the "peers" of other (enlightened) Tenners. And they were all quite angry about the fact that some people, somewhere, who no longer believed that the answer to every math problem was ten, should ever get together to talk about that fact. It was not fair; for any slight against the number ten itself, was a slight against the very individual Tenner himself. It was a personal attack. It was war. It wasn't fair that anyone, anywhere, should be doubting ten, or examining the suppposed "mistakes" in the calculations of Tenners.

Years passed. Some Tenners retired, others took their places, and yet the work remained much as it always had. One enterprising young Tenner even made a name for himself by coming up with the idea that variables, represented by letters, were in fact a kind of code, which when decoded "properly", once again allowed him to arrive at the one true answer:

Ten.

And on it will go forever, and ever, with ever more "creative" solutions to a besieging growth in mathematical knowledge, all showing that ten simply is not the answer to a vast number of mathematical problems. And more and more unable even to contemplate the (dangerous) substance of this growing mathematical knowledge, Tenners will increasingly rely on non-substantive responses, focusing instead on sloppy number drawing by anti-Tenners, the unacceptably light shade of graphite in pencils used by them, the non-recycled paper used by them, which can only mean they are "environment-haters", typographical errors in instructional math books, anti-Tenner tone of voice, their secret nefarious motivations, etc.

And more and more Ten sympathizers will leave the Tenners behind after having reviewed their material, noticing its ad hoc nature, and sadly having to acknowledge that while Ten might have things going for it, in the end, it is just not the answer to every mathematical problem, and isn't what it claims, so that no amount of legerdemain will ever be able to make it so...because it just isn't.

The End

Uncle Talmage